What do we expect the user will report here? The version of the elemental operator (the helm chart we release), right?
Looks good for this PR, probably we may want in the near future (another PR) to review the README of the repo and to update the RELEASES page --> created issue #363

What do we expect the user will report here? The version of the elemental operator (the helm chart we release), right?

I think in this repo more the Elemental version itself (ISO/iPXE), otherwise the draft should be in elemental-operator, no? Or also the version of the CLI and the toolkit might be needed (toolkit less interesting in fact maybe)?

Good point, makes sense, the ISO is likely the only thing that we should address here.
What confused me a bit is that while previously there was no operator and the cluster installation logic was managed by the binaries inside the ISO (so basically the ISO was Elemental, a 1:1 match), now there is the operator that takes care of the cluster provisioning part and that manages the configuration for the Elemental installation. So in my mind an "Elemental" release is made up of both the ISO and the operator chart.
Anyway, guess all will be more clear as soon as we update the Release section .

I think we should tell users to put here output from cat /etc/os-release

What do you think ?

I'm fine with the content of /etc/os-release, it should have we need, at least to know the image used.

I know that @Itxaka also begin to code an elemental-support tool that was/is mainly for dev purposes, but maybe it could be a good idea to add the resulting file in an issue? Let's see this for a later evolution of the draft, as I don't know if this tool will still exists.